BOI Reporting Ruling Highlights Government Overreach & Constitutional Concerns
The recent pushback against the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reporting requirements has sparked heated debate about government overreach, small business burdens, and constitutional rights. In a conversation on Rush to Reason with John Rush, Sunny Kutcher of Young Americans Against Socialism shed light on the implications of this controversial policy.
The BOI reporting requirements, implemented by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in early 2024, mandated that millions of businesses disclose sensitive personal information, including legal names, residential addresses, and identification details, to the federal government. While the stated goal of the policy is to combat money laundering, tax fraud, and other illicit activities, opponents argue it imposes unnecessary and unconstitutional burdens on small businesses.
Unpacking the Overreach
The CTA requires businesses to publicly identify their “beneficial owners,” stripping away anonymity that, for decades, was legally preserved. This anonymity is not inherently nefarious, as Sunny explains: “There are many legitimate reasons why business owners might want privacy—like safety, competitive strategy, or even personal protection.” In essence, critics argue that this move increases bureaucracy without meaningfully addressing the criminal activity it claims to prevent.
John Rush added, “Tax filings already provide the government with ownership details when required. This policy unnecessarily makes private information more public.”
The Constitutional Fight
The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) challenged the BOI requirements, arguing they violate constitutional rights, including:
• First Amendment: Right to anonymous association.
• Fourth Amendment: Protection against unreasonable disclosure of private information.
A federal judge recently ruled in favor of business owners, imposing a nationwide injunction against the policy. The ruling declared the mandate unconstitutional, exceeding congressional authority and infringing on individual privacy. U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland has since filed an appeal, signaling an ongoing legal battle with widespread implications.
As of December 26th, 2024, this injunction issued by the district court in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland is in effect and reporting businesses are not required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN.
Small Businesses at Risk
Beyond privacy concerns, small business owners face harsh penalties under the CTA: up to $500 per day in fines for non-compliance. Sunny pointed out the irony: “While millions are crossing the border with little oversight, law-abiding business owners are being hit with excessive regulations and fines.” Such policies, she argues, stifle growth, create fear, and “incentivize stagnation rather than innovation.”
Protecting Freedom and Economic IndependencE
At the heart of this debate is the larger question of government authority and individual liberty. Sunny and the team at Young Americans Against Socialism emphasize the importance of educating Americans—especially young people—about the dangers of government overreach. “Economic independence and freedom,” she says, “are what make the American Dream possible.”
In closing, Young Americans Against Socialism urges small business owners to remain vigilant, know their rights, and push back against unconstitutional policies that threaten innovation and prosperity.
Get Involved: If you’re a small business owner looking to share your story or highlight your business, contact the Young Americans Against Socialism team here.
If you enjoyed reading this article and would like to help Young Americans Against Socialism create more resources like this, please donate to our cause!